Rolando Vitali earned a Phd at the Friedrich Schiller Universität in Jena and the University of Bologna, with the thesis: Macht und Form – Individualität und ästhetische Kathegorien in der Philosophie Nietzsches (Königshausen & Neumann, 2022). He has been fellow in residence at the Nietzsche-Kolleg in Weimar, at the Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici (IISF) in Naples and in 2023 at the Ifilnova Institute at Nova University (Lisboa). He is currently post-doc researcher with a FWF ESPRIT Fellowship at the Akademie der Bildende Künste (Akbild) in Vienna and at the Potsdam Center for Post-Kantian Philosophy.
Dr. Rolando Vitali
Postdoctoral FWF ESPRIT Fellow
Period at the center: May -July 2027
Research Project: Adorno’s Aesthetics in the Age of the Anthropocene
Email: r.vitali@akbild.ac.at
WebsiteResearch Project
Adorno’s Aesthetics in the Age of the Anthropocene
“Adorno’s Aesthetics in the Age of Anthropocene” (AesthAnth) aims at showing the relevance of Theodor W. Adorno’s aesthetics and philosophy of history for the contemporary debate on the Anthropocene. It will propose an original understanding of Adorno’s aesthetic theory that interprets it based on Adorno’s idea of “natural history”: What Adorno calls an “aesthetic field” is produced by the intersection historical and natural dimensions. Thus interpreted, Adorno’s aesthetic philosophy represents a critical alternative to the positions labelled as “new materialism” currently predominant in the studies on the Anthropocene. Whereas new materialist positions try in various way to acquire a “non-anthropocentric” point of view, the point for Adorno is to grasp in a precise and determined way the concrete, dialectical, i.e. reciprocal intertwining of historical, human and social moments with natural ones: in other words, to assume the inescapable centrality of the human so as to be able to reflexively grasp its being nature. Adorno’s program for a “natural history” means thus “to comprehend an object as natural where it appears most historical and as historical where it appears most natural. The idea of natural-history, then, is the dialectics that can be extracted from a literal analysis of the term’s ambiguity: the history of nature is nature grasped as historical; natural history is the historical grasped as natural.” Whitin this perspective, the aesthetics is the privileged dialectical model of this natural-historical inquiry: in fact, aesthetic experience is characterized precisely by this intertwinement between historical and natural elements, in which what belongs to our sensation and imagination, and what springs from the aesthetic object, cannot (and should not) be rigidly distinguished.
Selected publications
Monographs
Macht und Form. Individualität und ästhetische Kategorien in der Philosophie Nietzsches, (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2022)
Articles
“Nature in the Subject. Spontaneity of Reason and Spontaneity of Nature in the Critique of Judgement”, in: Studi Kantiani, XXXIX, 2026 (forthcoming)
“’Negative universal history’ in the Anthropocene: The notion of “negative” in Chakrabarty’s revision of ‘universal history’ and Adorno’s dialectics”, in: Verifiche, 54 (2025), 59-83.
„Nihilismus und „Wirtschafts-Gesamtverwaltung der Erde” Ökonomische Elemente in der Nihilismusfrage bei Nietzsches Spätwerk“ in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, October, 71(5) (2023), 672-694.