| I recently completed my doctoral dissertation at Freie Universität Berlin. This engaged with the question of personal identity over time, seeking to assess the appropriateness of this question and its philosophical assumptions with regard to agency and temporality. I did this by engaging with the work of Derek Parfit, Christine Korsgaard and, most extensively, Martin Heidegger. Currently, I am developing a research project at the crossroads of aesthetics, philosophy of emotion and metaphysics on the uncanny. In the 2024/25 academic year I have also worked on a side project on the European New Right. |
Dr. des. Mihnea Chiujdea
Period at the center: November 2025 – April 2026
Research Project: The Uncanny – Finitude and Renewal
Email: mihnea.chiujdea@uni-potsdam.de / mihnea.chiujdea@fu-berlin.de
WebsiteResearch Project
The Uncanny – Finitude and Renewal
My project proposes a new philosophical investigation of the uncanny. While there has been a considerable amount of research on the uncanny in other fields, the depth and significance of the concept have received insufficient philosophical attention. My guiding hypothesis is that only normative beings, like ourselves, can experience not just angst, fear, uneasiness, or strangeness, but specifically the uncanny. Conversely, the experience of the uncanny is a specific mode of relating to our existence as normative beings. Therefore, an appropriate understanding of the uncanny can provide a new perspective on our existence, highlighting the precarity, finitude, and transformability of our being.
Methodologically, I suggest developing this notion of the uncanny and the corresponding understanding of normativity by means of an in-depth study of Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. While there is much literature exploring Heidegger’s contribution to normative theory, Heidegger scholars have given the uncanny short shrift. Exploring this gives us a new outlook both on Heidegger and on normative theory.
The upshot of the project is fourfold: 1. to deliver a new genuinely philosophical perspective on the uncanny, as yet restricted to cultural analysis; 2. to disclose a neglected dimension of Heidegger’s contribution to normative theory; 3. to make a systematic contribution to the ontology of the normative, specifically with regard to the leeway allowed by normativity and the productive potential of the uncanny; 4. to elucidate the origins and nature of the aesthetic forms of the uncanny.
Selected publications
Articles
“Maurice Merleau-Ponty on Violence and Marxism”, in: Opticon1826 15:1 (2013), 1-15.