Conference Conferences

The Wickedness of Freedom

Immorality and Reason after Kant

June 20-21, 2022 University of Potsdam
Obere Mensa, House 12

Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam

Save the date on your calendar
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
…
BEGIN:VEVENT
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220622
UID:182_cpkp_event
DESCRIPTION:Immorality and Reason after Kant // University of Potsdam // Obere Mensa, House 12 // Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:1
X-APPLE-TRAVEL-ADVISORY-BEHAVIOR:AUTOMATIC
SUMMARY:The Wickedness of Freedom
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220620
BEGIN:VALARM
X-WR-ALARMUID:182_cpkp_event_alarm
UID:182_cpkp_event_alarm
TRIGGER:-PT15H
X-APPLE-DEFAULT-ALARM:TRUE
ATTACH;VALUE=URI:Chord
ACTION:AUDIO
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

Hardly any thought is as defining for the systems and debates of Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy as the thought of the unity of freedom and law. The moral law, Kant teaches, is the law of autonomy; to be truly free is to realize the moral good. Neither Fichte nor Schelling nor Hegel seem to deny the unity of freedom and morality. Thus, it is not surprising if, for example, contemporary ethical constitutivism, according to which moral norms are grounded in the nature of rational, and therein free, agency, refers not only to Kant but also to other representatives of this epoch. It may therefore be surprising if in central passages of important works of Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy we find, in addition to the idea of the unity of freedom and law, at the same time also the counter-idea: the idea that precisely immorality – its reality, not only its possibility – is in a certain sense constitutive for our freedom and that consequently the free realization of morality and of reason would be impossible without immorality. In his Religion, Kant declares that we humans, the only beings under the moral law whose possibility we can make intelligible to ourselves at all, are morally evil with “subjective necessity”. Although Fichte does not simply adopt this doctrine of radical evil, he nevertheless discusses this idea in his System der Sittenlehre, not without reason, in the section on the “formal conditions of morality”. Hegel, otherwise Kant’s harshest critic, explicitly praises precisely the doctrine of radical evil and seems to radicalize it in the Morality chapter of his Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. And in his Freiheitsschrift, Schelling seeks an alternative between privation theories of evil on the one hand and the Manichean assertion of the positive character of evil on the other precisely in a theory of the “common root” of good and evil. For contemporary ethical constitutivism, freedom is an expression of our rational nature and consists in our being determined by the constitutive norms of rational action, which include those of morality. But the idea that the power of moral normativity could at the same time require in us a freedom from these norms seems to be completely absent from constitutivism – as well as from other contemporary approaches and interpretations of Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy, such as those that are more Wittgensteinian or Aristotelian in spirit, for example.

What is in each case the reason for the counter-idea to the idea of the unity of freedom and law in the representatives of the post-Kantian tradition mentioned above – and those not mentioned? And how are the two thoughts to be reconciled? What challenges arise for the perspectives of contemporary constitutivism and other approaches and interpretations that deny or neglect the counter-idea against the background of the Kantian and post-Kantian arguments? These are only three of the possible questions we want to discuss together at our conference.

Program

June 20, 2022

Obere Mensa, Campus Am Neuen Palais, Haus 12

  • 10:15 am-10:45 am – Thomas Khurana (Potsdam), Introduction
  • 10:45 am-12:00 am – Andy Reath (UC Riverside), A Rationalist Conception of the Will
    Chair: David Horst (University of Rio Grande do Sul)
  • 12:00 am-1:30 pm – Lunch Break
  • 1:30p m-2:45 pm – Katharina Kraus (Notre Dame), Kant’s Conception of a Person: Inner Systematicity and the Possibility of Immorality
    Chair: Mathias Ochs (Potsdam)
  • 2:45 pm-3:00 pm – Coffee Break
  • 3:00 pm-4:15 pm – Anastasia Berg (Jerusalem), Evil or Only Immature? Kant and the Complexity of Moral Failure
    Chair: Thomas Land (University of Victoria)
  • 4:15 pm-4:45 pm – Coffee Break
  • 4:45 pm-6:00 pm – Wolfram Gobsch (ETH Zürich), Kant’s Dialectical Ethics: The Case for Radical Evil and the Transgression Theory of Freedom
    Chair: Laura Papish (George Washington University)

June 21, 2022

Obere Mensa, Campus Am Neuen Palais, Haus 12

  • 10:15 am-11:30 am – Francey Russell (Barnard), Kant’s Fear of Fire and the Dark
    Chair: Camilla Angeli (FU Berlin)
  • 11:45 am-1:00 pm – Brady Bowman (Penn State), The Illegality of the Good in Jacobi and Hegel
    Chair: Charlotte Szász (Lüneburg)
  • 1:00 pm-2:30 pm – Lunch Break
  • 2:30 pm-3:45 pm – Dean Moyar (Johns Hopkins), Radical and Recognized Evil: Hegel’s Incorporation of the Counternormative
    Chair: Andrew Chignell (Princeton)
  • 3:45 pm-4:00 pm – Coffee Break
  • 4:00 pm-5:15 pm – Peter Dews (Essex), Reason and the Theory of the Will in Hegel and in Schelling’s Late Philosophy
    Chair: Andy Werner (Houston)
  • 5:15 pm-5:45 pm – Coffee Break
  • 5:45 pm-7:00 pm – Michelle Kosch (Cornell), Oppression, possession and unilateral recognition: Simone de Beauvoir on motivations for evil
    Chair: Isabel Sickenberger (Potsdam)

videos

 

Francey Russell (Barnard), Kant’s Fear of Fire and the Dark

 

 

Brady Bowman (Penn State), The Illegality of the Good in Jacobi and Hegel

 

 

Dean Moyar (Johns Hopkins), Radical and Recognized Evil: Hegel’s Incorporation of the Counternormative

 

 

Peter Dews (Essex), Reason and Theory of the Will in Hegel and Schelling’s Late Philosophy

Image

Lucas Cranach the Elder, Paradise (1530)